Thursday, August 29, 2019

Women Preach!

I believe God calls women to preach. And I believe this because the Bible is careful to clarify God's call and the Holy Spirit's anointing upon women. I happen to be part of the Church of the Nazarene which has, from it's beginning, affirmed the calling of God in the life of women to preach, teach, and lead in the church. They were committed to this not because of cultural trends or popular fads, but because it was Biblical truth.

As you read Scripture, it is clear that the frequency of women preaching, prophesying, or leading is less than that of men. There may be many factors that would influence that trend, but you cannot deny that God calls and speaks through women. The issue has never been about certain quotas of men vs women prophesying, but whether or not God does in fact speak through women in that way.

Some examples of women who ministered...

In the Old Testament there were women who served in various types of leadership positions. From Miriam, the sister of Moses and Aaron, to Deborah who led the Israelites into battle, the Bible is clear that women were both leaders and called by God. What is worth noting about both of these women is that they were also referred to as prophetesses (see Exodus 15:20 and Judges 4:4). They were women who prophesied. They were preachers. They spoke on behalf of God. It's a bit troubling to note that they would not be allowed to fulfill their calling in some churches and denominations though it is clear in God's Word that they obeyed the leading of the Holy Spirit. Biblically God often combines positions of leadership with preaching/prophesying.

Jesus' ministry is rife with teaching, instructing, and inclusion of women. Although he does not include a woman among the twelve disciples, this is poor evidence for Jesus seeking to exclude women from a call to be His disciples. His homogeneous group of male disciples is an indication that Jesus' concern for a sense of spiritual affirmative action concerning women is non existent. The kingdom of God obviously includes all people, of all races, of every economic level and social status in the world that have acknowledged Jesus as Lord. However, it may be that our push and emphasis on the "diversity" of our clergy is more in line with culture than with Christ.

Controversial or not, God clearly used women in every facet of the early church as well. Though culturally this may not have been accepted, the early church did not regard the gender of an individual as a determining factor for the filling of the Holy Spirit and God's ability to speak through them. In Acts 1, we are specifically told that, in addition to some of the men in the upper room, women have gathered for the prayer meeting too.

Peter's sermon at Pentecost refers back to the Old Testament prophet Joel's promise that in the last days God would pour out his Holy Spirit on men and women. This outpouring/anointing of the Holy Spirit would enable men and women to prophesy/preach!

Acts 18 gives us another glimpse of a husband and wife named Aquila and Priscilla who heard Apollos preach and took him aside for further teaching. A woman and her husband were instructing another preacher.

In Acts 21:9 we are told that an evangelist named Philip has four unmarried daughters who prophesied.

In Romans 16:1, Phoebe is referred to as a deacon of the church in Cenchraea. While some translations use the word 'servant' instead of 'deacon' the Greek word is literally deacon. The issue that can be debated here is whether the 'Deacon' is a formal title or a general service that every believer is to give to church.

A woman named Junia was commended by Paul in Romans 16:7 as someone who was imprisoned at the same time he was, but was "outstanding among the apostles" or, some translations say, "of note among the apostles." A female apostle.

Phoebe Palmer, a teacher and preacher in the holiness movement of the 1800's.
Some objections to women preaching...

There are some who are already referencing the verses that forbid women to do certain things in the church. To be Biblically true to Scripture, we must embrace all of God's Word. Let's look at them too.

1 Timothy 2 is among the most often referenced and quoted when arguing for the exclusion of women preaching or teaching in the church.

1 Timothy 2:11-15 (ESV) "Let a woman learn quietly with all submissiveness. [12] I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet. [13] For Adam was formed first, then Eve; [14] and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor. [15] Yet she will be saved through childbearing—if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control."

It's a pretty straight forward passage that plainly says "I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man; rather, she is to remain quiet."

The problem arises when we take this one passage as definitive interpretation of all circumstances in every church at every time. If it is read and interpreted in the context of all of God's Word (as every passage of Scripture should be), then we come to what would seem to be a paradox. Sometimes the Bible highlights, encourages, and even promises the coming of the Holy Spirit for women to preach/prophesy, even giving specific examples. Other times, as in Paul's first letter to Timothy, the Bible forbids women the ability to teach/lead in the church. Because of these seemingly contradictory passages we are forced to hone our interpretive ability.

The Conclusions we must come to is as follows:
There are times when God specifically calls and works through women. There are also clearly times when God requires their silence. The issue of women preaching, prophesying, teaching, leading, etc. is not a blanket statement of every woman (or every man for that matter) allowance or restriction to preach. There are times when women are called and utilized by God to speak and lead in His church. There are other times when God requires their silence.

We must acknowledge...

1. In the Old and New Testament, the Bible gives us examples of women who prophesied, led others (including men), and did so under the leadership of the Holy Spirit (at God's calling).

2. There were some instances when women in particular circumstances were not allowed to lead or teach in that setting. Only Conjecture could come up with reasons why Paul tells Timothy to forbid it, but the fact remains, there are some circumstances where women preaching or teaching was restricted.

3. The fact remains that there are many more Biblical examples of women who prophesied and were used by God than there are restrictions. Neither the restrictions to teach or the encouragements to preach apply to every woman. Not every woman is called to preach in a the formal sense, just like not every man is called to preach. There are some men who are not called to preach. There are some women who are not called to preach. There are some women who are called to preach. There are some men who are called to preach.

4. The responsibility of the church, the body of Christ, is to identify those people, whether male or female, who have the call of God on their life. Do they have the anointing of the Holy Spirit? Do they have the gifts & ability to communicate the Gospel? Do they themselves live holy lives that are evident to all around them?

Ultimately we must conclude from Scripture that someone's gender is not, in itself, either a qualification or a disqualification for the calling of God. God continues to pour out His Spirit on men and women today just as He promised through the prophet Joel. 

So ladies, if you are sensing God's call... preach! Preach always under the anointing of the Holy Spirit!


Also check out the following articles...

Why I like the Church of the Nazarene.

10 Reasons I Became a Feminist.

My Ordination Means Something.


Monday, August 26, 2019

Navigating Social Media

A few guidelines that may help you to navigate Social Media.

1. If it seems too good to be true, then it probably is. Be careful about clicking on mysterious messages or forwarding things on to all your friends. No legitimate message requires you to forward to everyone on your friends list! (Also note that forwarding a message with a picture of Jesus on it does not really qualify you for Heaven.)

2. Don't share false news stories. Promoting obviously biased articles about some outrageous thing that a politician did (who happens to be in a different party than you) is at best lazy and at worst dishonest and deceptive. Don't share wacked out stories. You are part of the problem when you share that stuff! Google or another search engine can be of great assistance in verifying the truthfulness of something you see on social media. Take the time to research.

3. The nature of social media is one of telling, not listening. While I'm sure many people are influenced by what they see on social media, debates that take place on posts rarely convince anyone to come to the other side of any issue. "I won the argument online" ...said no one ever! Reign in the debates. Use a little wisdom. Face to face conversations about differences of opinion are generally more civil and more productive.

4. Traumatic news of death, serious injury, natural disaster, dead bodies, pictures of people in distressing situations, etc do not need to be posted on social media. No one wants to find out that they lost a family member via social media (make sure all immediate family and relatives are aware of the passing of a family member before it reaches social media). No one wants to see their child in a painful situation because you posted the picture first. You are not helping anyone, you are harming people when you rush to "get it on Facebook." Do not succumb to the voyeurism of the hour in which we live.

5. Keep family discord off of social media. (This includes your church family too.) Having a disagreement with your family is, in many ways, a normal part of having family. While differences of opinion will no doubt rise among family members, the need to post issues of personal conflict in marriage, among family members, between co-workers or friends is not acceptable or even helpful. Problems arise from the fact that long after you have worked out your differences, you have social media voyeurs wondering what will happen in the next episode of your family's version of a soap opera.

6. Don't post your drama. It has never helped someone to post their frustration on Facebook. "Venting" on social media is a prescription for added chaos, not less mess. Typing out your frustration in work relationships, difficult days, or other drama simply doubles down your mind on the negative and frustrating elements of your situation. You become less thankful and more bitter the more drama you put on social media.

7. There is always someone who takes it upon themselves to become an online counselor. Many people assume their psychology degree comes from a keyboard. It is worth noting that on social media everyone has an opinion. The problem with that opinion is that it may be coming from someone who has problems more difficult than yours from which they have been unable to navigate themselves. For example, what if they are giving you marriage advice when they are in their 5th marriage? Do not become the person who thinks you can solve everyone else's problems. If you really want to help, meet the person in real life.

8. Get rid of your "know it all" tendencies. Ever noticed there are some people who seem to live on social media and quickly comment with their opinion whenever there is a need for advice? Some people to have all the answers, but it is often little more than a prideful attitude masked through the world wide web. Have something that can really help someone? Make an effort to personally invest in that person outside of a screen on your phone or computer.


What might you add?


Also check out the following articles...

Some Questions for the Pro-Choice

Get a Back Bone!

I Sin Every Day


Wednesday, August 14, 2019

Some Questions for the Pro-Choice...

I am obviously not a reporter, but I do wish that I had a chance to interview a "pro-choice/abortion" political candidate, celebrity, or outspoken supporter of abortion. Generally, reporters seem to be obviously biased toward a pro-abortion stance and illustrate that in their questions. It seems to me that the questions asked can make a huge difference in how everyone perceives the interview. For example, I would ask the following questions of "pro-choice" individuals...

(1) Many state & federal laws allow criminal to be prosecuted if an assault on a mother causes injury or death to the unborn baby. Do you support these laws? How does legal protection of those children differ from protection of children from abortion?

(2) Most pro-choice individuals say that they are looking out for the best interests of women. Other than preserving their "right" to kill their child, what are you doing for the best interests of women? Does that include the best interests of a female baby in the womb?

(3) What rights do you believe a father should have in the decision about abortion?

(4) Do you believe that there are any times when abortion is morally wrong? If so, what would they be? Would you work to make those immoral circumstances illegal?

(5) If it was absolutely proven to you that a "fetus" is a living human being, would you become pro-life?


(6) Do you believe that unwanted children or children you consider to have a "low quality of life" should be killed? Do you believe that unwanted children or children you consider to have a potentially "low quality of life" but are still in the womb should be killed?

(7) Do you believe that someone should be able to abort their child because they have a physical or mental disability? Do you believe that someone should be able to abort their child based on the child's gender?

(8) Do you object to abortion after the point in pregnancy that it has been medically proven that the baby feels pain?

(9) If a child somehow survives an abortion and is born alive do you believe it's life should be protected?

(10) I am going to take the liberty of characterizing your position, and then I want you to tell me where I’m wrong. You want abortion to be legal right up to the moment of birth, (for all nine months of pregnancy); for any reason whatsoever, for no reason whatsoever; for a minor girl of any age,  without parental consent, without even parental knowledge; and if she can’t pay for it, you think the government ought to. Is there anything inaccurate about that statement?

What questions might you add?


See also the following articles:

All Out for Souls

Why I Like Small Churches

Why I Don't Play the Lottery